CATrends: Baseball Ticket Prices
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
Electronic Arts Inc.
March 2016: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
July 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Electronic Arts Inc. (“EA”) for allegedly misleading consumers about their ability to use EA’s software, including the popular FIFA Soccer 2011, to play games with others via the Internet (i.e., “online play”). Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that EA marketed its software as available for “online play” for an indefinite period of time or, at a minimum, a reasonable time from its release date, but that the company “retired” the products early and thus they are no longer available for online play. (Bassett et al. v. Electronic Arts Inc., Case No. 13-cv-04208, E.D.N.Y.)
The Latest
Consumer Cellular
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
TINA.org Action Sheds Light on SunPowerLED’s False Endorsement Claims
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
VIN History USA’s ‘Free’ VIN Report
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.