James ‘Jay’ Noland’s Latest Ventures Raise Familiar Concerns
Permanently banned from MLM, Noland has found other ways to exploit consumers.
EFT Holdings
April 2016: More named plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their claims, the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
May 2015: Several named plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their claims When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
October 2014: This lawsuit was consolidated with another lawsuit, Li et al v. Jack J. Qin, EFT Holdings, Inc. et al. (Case No. 13-cv-8832, C. D. CA.)
November 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed alleging that, among other things, EFT Holdings, Inc. is operating a pyramid scheme and claiming that consumers can make money by recruiting new members when, in reality, most members do not make any money. (Li et al v. EFT Holdings, Inc., Qin, and Does 1-10, Case No. 13-cv-08835, C. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding pyramid schemes and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
The Latest
Broadway.com
Pulling back the curtain on this official-sounding website.
Wuffy and Other ‘AI’ Dogs
Can these “robot” puppies replace man’s best friend?
Ellipse by LegXercise (aka Ellipse One)
Can you actually work out without the work?
US Patent and Trademark Office Impersonator Reported to FTC
MADISON, CONN. Feb. 11, 2026 – A company calling itself “Patent & Trademark Office” is violating the FTC’s Impersonation Rule as well as the FTC Act by falsely posing as…