
Ancestry.com
TINA.org uncovers questionable roots behind this “free” offer.
In March 2014, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed her false advertising class-action lawsuit against Cosmetic Dermatology, Inc, makers of “Dr. Brandt’s Pores No More Mattifying Lotion.” The complaint, which was originally filed in 2013, alleged that, among other things, the company markets the lotion as “oil free” when it actually contains at least three oils. We do not know why the plaintiff chose to dismiss the lawsuit. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice, meaning the plaintiff may refile the complaint. (Tran et al v. Cosmetic Dermatology, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-09311, C.D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the advertising of beauty products and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
TINA.org uncovers questionable roots behind this “free” offer.
These claims to detect intolerances to more than 200 foods are tough to stomach.
Lawsuits challenge American-made claims.
TINA.org takes a bite out of company’s research.
Don’t let this vacation ad trip you up.