The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
Gay et al. v. Diff, LLC
26-cv-6242, C.D. Cal.
(June 2026)
Diff eyewear
Falsely advertising discounts as available for a limited time
Misleadingly advertising in email subject lines that consumers can get discounts off any item and then disclosing in the body of the email that several items are excluded from the discounts
Pending
The DSA misses the mark.
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?