1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Binder et al. v. Premium Brands Opco LLC
23-cv-3939, S.D.N.Y.
(May 2023)
Binder et al. v. Premium Brands Opco LLC
25CU012849N, California state court – San Diego
(March 2025)
Merchandise sold at Ann Taylor Factory Stores and LOFT outlet stores
Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
Binder case (No. 23-cv-3939): Dismissed (June 2024 order and 2025 order)
Binder case (No. 25CU012849N): Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://pbocpricingsettlement.com/
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.