
Court Cancels ‘Click-to-Cancel’ Rule
It won’t get any easier to cancel those annoying subscriptions.
In 2010, a class action was brought against Diamond Foods alleging that the company made false and misleading statements in its marketing material about the health benefits of eating walnuts. (Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-1192-JSW, N.D.Ca.)
Update: In 2012, the parties settled this lawsuit. Diamond agreed to provide $2.6 million to reimburse consumers who bought its walnuts. If you purchased Diamond of California walnuts between 2006 and 2012, you may be eligible for a refund of $3.25 or $8.25.
It won’t get any easier to cancel those annoying subscriptions.
This soft drink reminds consumers of the good old days.
What you need to know about this offer.
What’s this kidfluencer doing promoting a “youth cream”?
Emily Baker-White, Forbes