
Merchandise on www.devacurl.com
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
In March 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Deva Curl for allegedly falsely and misleadingly marketing that products – including various DevaCurl conditioners and cleansers, Wavemaker, Super Stretch Coconut Curl Elongator, and other products – enhance and “bring out the best in curls,” are “free of harsh ingredients,” contain only “natural and functional ingredients,” and are safe when, according to the complaint, the product contains harmful allergens and irritants, and the company does not adequately disclose that there are safety risks associated with using the products, including hair loss, hair damage, and scalp injury. (Andriamaniraka et al v. Deva Concepts, LLC d/b/a Deva Curl, Case No. 20-cv-479, S.D. Cal.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of the marketing of hair products, click here.
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
Web extension may be better at maxing out your credit card than the full capabilities of AI.
FTC alleged company vastly overstated the accuracy of its AI Content Detector tool.
Apple iPhone 16 users are asking Siri, where are the AI features that were touted in ads?
Get the dirt on this company’s “risk-free” trial.
TINA.org sheds light on medical device company’s marketing claims.