Derma E Skincare Products
October 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been disclosed.
April 2018: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint similarly alleging that Derma E® misleadingly markets skincare products as natural when, according to plaintiffs, they actually contain synthetic, artificial, and non-natural ingredients.
October 2016: This case was transferred to federal court. (Case No. 16-cv-7735, S. D. NY.)
August 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Derma E® for allegedly misleadingly marketing its skincare products – including lotions, scrubs, and cleansers – as natural when, according to plaintiffs, they contain synthetic ingredients. (Petrosino et al v. Stearn’s Products, Inc. d/b/a Derma E®, Case No. 2016-52186, Supreme Court of New York – County of Dutchess)
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
Rapid Radios
Does this walkie-talkie actually work from anywhere?
NA-KD Fashion
Not all free shipping claims are cut from the same cloth.
BullyKamp
FDA warns that this pet company’s marketing bites off more than it can chew.
CFPB Proposes Paycheck Advance Rule
TINA.org joins coalition of consumer organizations in support of the proposed rule
ARMRA Colostrum Supplements
Company distances itself from touted “studies” while continuing to use deceptive health claims.