CATrends: Tequilas Marketed as 100% Agave
Ingredient claims come into the limelight.
Forstrom et al. v. Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
24-cv-2604, D. Minn.
(July 2024)
Johnson et al. v. Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
24-cv-2535, D. Minn.
(June 2024)
Kamrath et al. v. Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
24-cv-2528, D. Minn.
(June 2024)
Koepsel et al. v. Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
24-cv-2708, D. Minn.
(July 2024)
Mathisen et al. v. Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
24-cv-2626, D. Minn.
(July 2024)
Pester et al. v. Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
24-cv-2599, D. Minn.
(July 2024)
Sands et al. v. Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
24-cv-2615, D. Minn.
(July 2024)
Thomas et al. v. Consulting Radiologists, Ltd.
24-cv-2482, D. Minn.
(June 2024)
Consulting Radiologists
Misrepresenting that it protects patients’ personal information when it failed to do so and there was a data breach in February 2024
Pending
Ingredient claims come into the limelight.
Beware of food images wrapped in deception.
The DSA misses the mark.
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.