
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Finster et al. v. Sephora USA Inc.
22-cv-1187, N.D.N.Y.
(Nov. 2022)
Clean At Sephora cosmetic products
Misleadingly marketing products as “clean” when a significant percentage of them contain synthetic and harmful ingredients
Dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.