July 2016: A federal judge dismissed this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction after refusing to certify the class finding that certain requirements for class certification were not met.
April 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Clarins for allegedly deceptively marketing beauty-enhancing creams in the Vital Light Collection and the Body Lift Collection. Among other things, the complaint alleges that the company promises its creams will restore “the deep luminosity of young-looking skin” and fight cellulite when, in reality, the creams cannot provide the promised results. (Garcia et al v. Clarins USA, Inc., Clarins Inc., Clarins North America, Inc., Clarins Group North America, Inc., Clarins SA, Clarins Paris, Case No. 14-cv-21249, S. D. FL.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding anti-aging products and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
August 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed, the reasons for which have not been disclosed. July 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Clarins U.S.A. for allegedly falsely advertising Clarins…
Honda will never let failure stand in their way because the bigger the dream, the bigger the drive to keep chasing it.
Will this cat company give you the purrfect allergy relief?
Regulator finds TikTok ads misled consumers into thinking they could win real-world prizes.
An investigation into the menopause supplement industry by consumer advocacy organization truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org) has revealed a hotbed of deceptive advertising. The ad watchdog has amassed nearly 2,000 examples of problematic health…
How the supplement industry is taking advantage of women and what TINA.org is doing to fight it.