Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Check ‘N Go
February 2015: A federal judge dismissed this case concluding that plaintiffs failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
August 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Check ‘N Go for allegedly advertising its loans as a “short term solution and not as a source of ongoing help” and “a good alternative to … credit card debt” when, according to plaintiffs, the company burdens borrowers with expensive, long-term debt, enforced by unconscionable terms and conditions, which they know borrowers will have little or no ability to understand or repay. (Plaintiffs amended their complaint in July 2014.) (Townsend et al. v. Eastern Specialty Finance, Inc., d/b/a Check ‘N Go, Case No. 13-cv-01403, D. Del.)
The Latest
CATrends: Baseball Ticket Prices
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
Consumer Cellular
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
TINA.org Action Sheds Light on SunPowerLED’s False Endorsement Claims
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.