The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
Bodywell Cellphone Chips
Case Name (Date)
Hoffman et al. v. Haim Einhorn et al.
26-cv-1414, D.N.J.
(Jan. 2026)
Product/Service
Bodywell cellphone chips
Allegations
Falsely advertising that products provide various health benefits – including that they reduce the amount of radiation that a brain absorbs by 80 percent and the temperature of a brain by 50 percent; reduce headaches, hand pain and anxiety; and improve sleep quality and mental clarity – when the products do not provide any of the advertised benefits
Status
Pending
The Latest
Ocean Spray Cranberry Juice Blend
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?