
Consumers Throw Flags on Super Bowl Advertisers
Six big game marketers that have been accused of fumbling ad claims.
Figueroa et al. v. BlendJet, Inc.
23-cv-7911, S.D.N.Y.
(Sept. 2023)
Gould et al. v. BlendJet Inc.
24-cv-1273, S.D. Ill.
(April 2024)
BlendJet2
Misleadingly marketing that blenders hold charge for “15+ blends,” “crush ice” and “power[] through anything in 20 seconds flat: ice, frozen fruit, leafy greens & more” when they fail to work as advertised due to a defect
Figueroa case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Gould case: Pending
Six big game marketers that have been accused of fumbling ad claims.
This marketing may come with some baggage.
Madison Burgess, Daily Mail
This gym may want to work harder at being transparent about this offer.
TINA.org examines holes in “bulletproof” product claims.