There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
DiLorenzo et al v. Bitdefender Inc. et al
37-2019-00066655, California State Court – San Diego
(2019)
Bitdefender’s antivirus software
Failing to adequately disclose that programs automatically renew resulting in consumers being charged without consent
Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
https://www.softwareautorenewalsettlement.com/Home.aspx
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.