The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
Gromov et al. v. Belkin Int’l, Inc.
22-cv-6918, N.D. Ill.
(Dec. 2022)
Miley et al. v. Belkin Int’l, Inc.
20STCV00033, California state court
(Jan. 2020)
Belkin power banks
Falsely representing the mAh rating of power banks as higher than it actually is
Gromov case: Settled and stayed
Miley case: Settled
(Preliminarily approved)
The DSA misses the mark.
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?