BayPort Credit Union
In April 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against BayPort Credit Union for allegedly misleadingly representing that it charges overdraft and non-sufficient funds fees when an account does not have enough money to cover a transaction when, according to plaintiffs, the credit union assesses such fees using an artificial balance that deducts holds placed on deposits and pending transactions instead of the actual balance. In addition, plaintiffs claim that the credit union misleadingly represents that it charges only one fee on a single transaction when, according to the complaint, a new fee is charged every time a transaction is reprocessed for payment resulting in multiple fees being charged on one transaction. (Barker et al v. BayPort Credit Union, Case No. 20-cv-195, E.D. Va.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of banks and credit unions, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
Nike: Rip The Script
It was all going to plan until footballer’s instincts took over.
Did Timothée Chalamet Just Take a Dig at Deceptive Marketing?
Why I’m a fan of this Adidas World Cup ad.
‘Bet Now’: How Wagering Apps’ Push Notification Ads Bombard Consumers
TINA.org joins petition urging FTC to require consent and opt-out for gambling marketing.
Does Gatorade ‘Hydrate Better than Water’?
Lawsuits takes aim at sports drinks’ superior hydration claim.
Phoebe Gates’s Startup Phia Was Just Accused of ‘Cookie Stuffing.’ Here’s What Happens Next
Esther Lian, Inc.com