
Meet the Law Firm Driving a Surge in ‘Made in America’ Advertising Suits
Patrick Coffee, The Wall Street Journal
In October 2014, a federal judge granted preliminary approval of a $4.5 million settlement of two consolidated false advertising class-action lawsuits filed against Babolat, the tennis equipment company. The complaints, which were originally filed in 2013, alleged that the company claimed that the professionals it sponsors use the same tennis racquets sold to the public when, in reality, Babolat painted and modified the racquets used by the pros to look like the ones sold to the public. In addition, plaintiffs claimed that the company represented that tungsten fibers in the racquets’ frames increase stability and power when, in reality, tungsten was not used in the racquets. According to the settlement terms, class members with proof of purchase may receive a $50 refund for each adult racquet purchased and a $25 refund for each junior racquet purchased. A hearing for final approval of the settlement is scheduled for April 6, 2015. (Ahdoot et al v. Babolat VS North America, Inc. and Does 1-10, Case No. 13-cv-02823, C. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding the deceptive advertising of tennis racquets and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.
Patrick Coffee, The Wall Street Journal
Web extension may be better at maxing out your credit card than the full capabilities of AI.
FTC alleged company vastly overstated the accuracy of its AI Content Detector tool.
Apple iPhone 16 users are asking Siri, where are the AI features that were touted in ads?
Get the dirt on this company’s “risk-free” trial.