
AZEK Decking
February/March 2014: This case was transferred to a court in New Jersey to be heard with other similar cases. To learn more about the multidistrict litigation (MDL), click here.
January 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against AZEK Building Products, Inc. for allegedly falsely marketing its products. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that AZEK Decking products will not blister, peel, flake, crack, split, or rot for 20 years when, in reality, they crack, split, and discolor shortly after installation. (Marino et al v. AZEK Building Products, Inc., and CPG International, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-10018, D. Mass.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against the AZEK Building Products and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Class-Action Tracker


AZEK PVC Synthetic Decking
The Latest

DSSRC’s Arbonne Decision Gets It Wrong
Council blesses MLM’s use of unsubstantiated earnings claims.

MyLowe’s Rewards Free Shipping
TINA.org hammers out the fine print details of this advertised member perk.

The Rise of ‘Bait-and- Switch Pricing’
Emily Stewart, Business Insider

TINA.org Finds U-Haul Using Bait-and-Switch Pricing Scheme
MADISON, CONN. May 6, 2025 – U-Haul is engaged in a bait-and-switch pricing scheme with its $19.95 truck rental ads, according to an investigation by consumer advocacy organization truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org).…

U-Haul Needs to Pack Up Its Deceptive ‘$19.95’ Truck Ads
TINA.org calls on regulators to stop moving company’s bait and switch.