AZEK Decking and Railing Products
February 2014: This case was transferred to a court in New Jersey to be heard with other similar cases. To learn more about the multidistrict litigation (MDL), click here. April…
February/March 2014: This case was transferred to a court in New Jersey to be heard with other similar cases. To learn more about the multidistrict litigation (MDL), click here.
January 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against AZEK Building Products, Inc. for allegedly falsely marketing its products. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that AZEK Decking products will not blister, peel, flake, crack, split, or rot for 20 years when, in reality, they crack, split, and discolor shortly after installation. (Marino et al v. AZEK Building Products, Inc., and CPG International, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-10018, D. Mass.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against the AZEK Building Products and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
February 2014: This case was transferred to a court in New Jersey to be heard with other similar cases. To learn more about the multidistrict litigation (MDL), click here. April…
January 2018: Plaintiffs moved for final approval of the settlement agreement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for March 13, 2018. August 2017: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of…
Consumer complaints worth remembering.
Why this eyewear company’s advertised “starting” prices may not be 20/20.
MADISON, CONN. Dec. 12, 2024— In a win for consumers, a court has ordered Quincy Bioscience to stop advertising Prevagen using memory-improvement claims. This follows a near-decade-long campaign by the…
What led up to brain supplement’s December to remember.
Jessica Bennett, The Cut