The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
February 2020: A state court judge granted final approval of a settlement agreement. According to the settlement terms, AutoZone agreed to:
For more information, go to https://www.azrewardslitigation.com/.
August 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against AutoZone for allegedly misleadingly representing that customers who make purchases of more than $20 earn reward credits toward a $20 Reward when, according to plaintiffs, AutoZone did not properly disclose that it changed its rewards program such that credits expire after twelve months and $20 Rewards expire after three months. (Hughes et al v. AutoZone Parts, Inc. et al, Case No. BCG31080, California State Court – Los Angeles)
The DSA misses the mark.
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?