
DOJ Orders doTerra Distributors to Pay $15,000 Each after TINA.org Complaint
Complaints against additional distributors who hosted COVID webinars may be forthcoming.
In November 2013, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Atlas Roofing Corporation alleging that its Atlas Chalet Shingles did not perform as represented in the product’s various marketing materials (including brochures and product labels). Specifically, the complaint alleges that the company advertises that the roofing shingles meet applicable building codes and industry standards when, in reality, they do not. In addition, plaintiffs claim the company represents that the shingles would last 30 years when, in reality, the shingles are defective causing them to blister and crack before 30 years have passed. (Brooks et al v. Atlas Roofing Corp., Case No. 13-cv-00187, S. D. MS.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding shingles and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Complaints against additional distributors who hosted COVID webinars may be forthcoming.
TINA.org files comment in support of applying rule to direct selling industry.
Even celebs have FOMO
Don’t Be Like Mike and get an FDA/FTC warning letter regarding COVID claims.
U.S.-origin claims questioned after consumer receives box labeled ‘Made in Vietnam.’