
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
McFadden et al. v. At Home Group, Inc.
24-cv-4504, D.N.J.
(April 2024)
At Home products, including candle holders
Misleadingly advertising discounts off of artificially inflated original prices
Pending
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.