Fairlife Milk
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Dimarco et al. v. Aspire Brands, Inc.
24-cv-5021, E.D.N.Y.
(July 2024)
Aspire Energy Drinks
Falsely marketing products as natural and containing no preservatives when they contain two synthetic preservatives (citric acid and ascorbic acid)
Settled and voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Company’s animal welfare claims – and brand name – face increasing scrutiny.
Consumers balk at hidden junk fees.
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.