Amy’s Kitchen Food
October 2016: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
September 2014: A false advertising class-action lawsuit filed against Amy’s Kitchen was transferred from the Northern District of Illinois to Northern District of California. The complaint, which was originally filed in Illinois state court in 2013, alleges that the company mislabels products – including its Asian Noodle Stir-Fry, Roasted Vegetable Lasagna, and Baked Ziti Bowl – as containing “evaporated cane juice” when, according to plaintiffs, they contain sugar. (Gilbert et al v. Amy’s Kitchen, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-04380, N.D. Cal.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Amy’s Kitchen and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about sugar, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Amy’s Kitchen
The Latest
‘Nature’s Hidden Cures’
The truth about this “free” book and its mysterious publisher.
Influencers’ quiet disclosures lagged behind LVCVA’s loud promotion of Formula One race
Kyle Chouinard, Las Vegas Sun
Regulators Deliver Actions against HelloFresh
Regulatory activity following TINA.org’s 2022 complaint.
JetBlue’s ‘Flight Disruptions’ Refund Policy
Clear policy or moving target?
LifeLock’s Identity Theft Protection
Is your Social Security number as vulnerable as this company claims?