Amy’s Kitchen Food
October 2016: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
September 2014: A false advertising class-action lawsuit filed against Amy’s Kitchen was transferred from the Northern District of Illinois to Northern District of California. The complaint, which was originally filed in Illinois state court in 2013, alleges that the company mislabels products – including its Asian Noodle Stir-Fry, Roasted Vegetable Lasagna, and Baked Ziti Bowl – as containing “evaporated cane juice” when, according to plaintiffs, they contain sugar. (Gilbert et al v. Amy’s Kitchen, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-04380, N.D. Cal.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Amy’s Kitchen and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about sugar, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Amy’s Kitchen
The Latest
AT&T’s Connectivity Guarantee
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
CATrends: Packed in ‘100% Fruit Juice’
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
A $49.95 Any Sewer or Drain
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
What You Should Know about LED Face Masks
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.
Courtney Sanders’ Life Coaching Programs
Be wary of these life-changing claims.