Amy’s Kitchen Food
October 2016: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
September 2014: A false advertising class-action lawsuit filed against Amy’s Kitchen was transferred from the Northern District of Illinois to Northern District of California. The complaint, which was originally filed in Illinois state court in 2013, alleges that the company mislabels products – including its Asian Noodle Stir-Fry, Roasted Vegetable Lasagna, and Baked Ziti Bowl – as containing “evaporated cane juice” when, according to plaintiffs, they contain sugar. (Gilbert et al v. Amy’s Kitchen, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-04380, N.D. Cal.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Amy’s Kitchen and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about sugar, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Amy’s Kitchen
The Latest
Consumer Cellular
TINA.org uncovers the limits of this carrier’s “unlimited” data plans.
There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
TINA.org Action Sheds Light on SunPowerLED’s False Endorsement Claims
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
VIN History USA’s ‘Free’ VIN Report
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
Will the MLM Industry Fix Its Earnings Claims Problem?
New research points to “no.”