Amy’s Kitchen Food
October 2016: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
September 2014: A false advertising class-action lawsuit filed against Amy’s Kitchen was transferred from the Northern District of Illinois to Northern District of California. The complaint, which was originally filed in Illinois state court in 2013, alleges that the company mislabels products – including its Asian Noodle Stir-Fry, Roasted Vegetable Lasagna, and Baked Ziti Bowl – as containing “evaporated cane juice” when, according to plaintiffs, they contain sugar. (Gilbert et al v. Amy’s Kitchen, Inc., Case No. 14-cv-04380, N.D. Cal.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Amy’s Kitchen and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about sugar, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
Amy’s Kitchen
The Latest
The FTC is not anti-direct selling. It’s pro-truth in advertising.
The DSA misses the mark.
Ocean Spray Cranberry Juice Blend
TINA.org reader takes issue with this product’s deceptive packaging.
Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?