1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
In January 2016, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Armourcard USA for, among other things, allegedly falsely representing that the FCC has approved and authorized Amourcard’s Forcefield Radio Frequency Identification protection card (an electronic protective device that emits a jamming force-field to protect your personal data from being stolen). (Baker et al v. Armourcard USA, Inventures International INc., and HSN, Inc., Case No. 16-cv-488, E. D. NY.)
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.