AG1 Subscriptions

Hoke et al. v. AG1 (USA), Inc.
26-cv-1110, C.D. Cal.
(Feb. 2026)

AG1 subscriptions for dietary supplements

Failing to adequately disclose the terms of subscriptions and making it difficult to cancel

Pending

Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.

Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?

Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.

TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.

TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.