Acana and Orijen Pet Foods
Case Name (Date)
Weaver et al v. Champion Petfoods USA Inc. et al
18-cv-1996, E.D. Wis.
(Dec. 2018)
Product/Service
Acana and Orijen pet foods
Allegations
Deceptively marketing pet foods as “biologically appropriate” and made using “fresh, natural ingredients” without disclosing that the products contain heavy metals, toxins, unnatural ingredients, and ingredients that are not fresh
Status
Summary judgment affirmed on appeal
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
AT&T’s Connectivity Guarantee
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
CATrends: Packed in ‘100% Fruit Juice’
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
A $49.95 Any Sewer or Drain
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
What You Should Know about LED Face Masks
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.