Consumer News

By the Numbers: Made in the USA Class-Action Lawsuits

A closer look at the who, what, where, when, and why.

|

Consumer News

By the Numbers: Made in the USA Class-Action Lawsuits

You could stock a small store with the products that have been accused of being deceptively marketed as made in the USA in recent years. Items range from jeans and boots, to watches and neckties, to energy drinks, beef products, tobacco products and even condoms.

Briefly, for a product to be marketed as made in the USA, “all or virtually all” of the product must be made in the United States. That means the product must contain no — or negligible — foreign content. For example, a product that is assembled in the United States with mainly imported parts cannot be marketed as made in the USA under the FTC’s Made in USA standard.

TINA.org is currently tracking more than 60 class-action lawsuits challenging made in the USA marketing claims. A breakdown of everything from where and when the complaints were filed, to the status of the cases as of February 2025, follows.

Products and Companies

Twenty-five percent of the made in the USA class-action complaints relate to U.S.-origin claims for clothing, shoes and accessories. These include lawsuits alleging that:

  • New Balance marketed shoes as “Made in USA” when a substantial portion of the components are made in other countries;
  • AG Adriano Goldschmied jeans labeled as “Made in the USA” use fabric, thread, and buttons manufactured outside of the states;
  • Chippewa boots marketed as “handcrafted in the USA” have inner leather linings from China; and
  • Shinola watches marketed as made in America use timekeeping parts from Switzerland and Thailand.

Twenty-three percent of the class-action lawsuits relate to made in the USA marketing claims for food and beverages. These include lawsuits alleging that:

  • Beef products from Tyson Foods, Kroger and others labeled as “Product of the USA” contain either imported beef or beef from imported cattle;
  • Kraft Heinz sauces and condiments labeled as “MFD. In U.S.A.” contain ingredients produced outside of the United States;
  • Busch Beer marketed as “Product of U.S.A.” is brewed with imported hops;
  • Bigelow teas advertised as “manufactured in the USA” contain ingredients grown in other countries; and
  • American Tuna products marketed as “Caught and Canned in America” contain tuna that is not caught in American waters and is canned outside of the United States.

Plaintiffs also hit companies with lawsuits alleging that dietary supplements, energy drinks, auto parts, tobacco products, alcohol products, condoms, vacuum cleaners, pet treats and children’s toys are deceptively marketed as made in the USA. Some of the companies named as defendants include Walmart, Reynolds Consumer Products, Pyrex, Lands’ End, Lowe’s, Igloo and General Motors.

In addition, some of the complaints allege that products are falsely advertised as from a particular state in the United States when they actually come from other countries. One complaint alleges that Whistlepig Straight Rye Whiskey is marketed as produced on and with ingredients from a farm in Vermont when they are produced in Canada without any ingredients from the Vermont farm. Another lawsuit claims fruits and vegetables in Cascadian Farm frozen products are marketed as grown in Washington state when they are imported from other countries. Still another lawsuit alleges that Ducktrap River of Maine smoked salmon is advertised as from Maine when the salmon comes from outside of the United States.

Breakdown of Products at Issue

Location of Courts

Made in the USA class actions were filed in 14 different states, with 13 cases filed in state courts and 52 cases in federal courts. (Note: Some of the lawsuits were originally filed in state court and later transferred to federal court.) A vast majority (34) of the cases were filed in California. The remaining lawsuits were filed in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, New York, South Dakota and Tennessee.

Original File Date

Made in the USA complaints in our sampling were filed between 2011 and February 2025. The number of complaints increased each year until 2015. The decrease in lawsuits in subsequent years may be attributable to the fact that in 2015, California changed its Made in USA law. The law was amended to relax the state’s strict requirements that prohibited Made in USA labels on products containing any part that was “entirely or substantially made, manufactured, or produced outside of the United States,” to a rule that closely aligns with the FTC’s standard. The new California law allows merchandise to bear the Made in USA label as long as it has been “all or virtually all made in the United States.” Since then, the number of Made in USA class actions has dropped drastically.

Status of the Cases

Eighty percent of the made in the USA lawsuits TINA.org has been tracking have been resolved, with 27 settlement agreements, 5 dismissals and 20 voluntarily dismissals for undisclosed reasons. One of the dismissals was affirmed on appeal.

Federal courts dismissed one of the made in the USA actions in 2016, two in 2017, one in 2020 and one in 2024. Specifically, a California court dismissed a case against Rockstar Energy because the complaint did not specify where the foreign ingredients were from nor the percentage of foreign ingredients in the products. Another California court dismissed a case against the jeans company Citizens of Humanity because the allegations were conclusory and did not meet a requirement for fraud claims. A court in Illinois dismissed a case against the pet food company WellPet, LLC because the complaint did not sufficiently allege injury and likelihood of future damages. Another California court dismissed a case against Handi-Foil because the allegations were conclusory, did not specify the amount of imported materials in products and failed to meet the heightened pleading standard for fraud claims. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit regarding a “Product of the USA” label on beef products concluding that the complaint failed to state a claim for false advertising and the claims were preempted by federal law.

Of the 27 cases that were settled, the terms were disclosed in 18 of the settlement agreements. The settlement agreements in 17 of these cases provided class members with cash awards, promo codes or gift cards to purchase products, or a free product. The company agreed to make changes to marketing materials or to comply with the law in 16 of the agreements.

Find more of our coverage on made in the USA claims here.


You Might Be Interested In