Decoding Cosmetics Claims: ‘Not Tested on Animals,’ ‘Cruelty Free’
TINA.org investigates what’s behind the cruelty-free logos on the labels of cosmetic products.
Tarte High-Performance Naturals
January 2020: A federal court judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
October 2019: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of the settlement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for January 28, 2020.
September 2019: The parties filed an amended settlement agreement that contains revised provisions regarding the notice plan, class definition, and cy pres relief, among other things.
August 2019: A federal judge granted preliminary approval of the settlement agreement.
January 2019: Plaintiffs moved for preliminary approval of a proposed settlement agreement that would full refunds to class members who retained proof of purchase, while those without proof of purchase may receive a $5 refund for up to ten products. The company also agreed to add a disclosure that the products are “Formulated with a blend of naturally-derived and other ingredients designed to perform” and direct consumers to a webpage that the company will create as part of the agreement that explains the company’s philosophy and definitions of natural ingredients.
December 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Tarte, Inc. for allegedly misleadingly marketing its “high-performance naturals” line of products as natural when, according to plaintiffs, they contain synthetic ingredients. (Patora et al v. Tarte, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-11760, S.D.N.Y.)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of natural claims, click here.
The Latest