
Prevagen
TINA.org investigated the marketing of Prevagen, a supplement aimed at people suffering from memory loss, and found that Quincy Bioscience — the marketer and manufacturer of Prevagen — deceptively claimed…
A false advertising class-action lawsuit against Quincy Bioscience was dismissed in June 2016. The complaint, which was originally filed in state court in March 2015 and transferred to federal court in September 2015, alleged that the company advertises the products as “Clinically Tested” to “Improve[] Memory” by 7.5% within 8 days, 10% within 30 days, and 20% within 90 days and support “Healthy Brain Function” when, in reality, the product does not support memory or brain function at all and the company makes the claims without adequate scientific evidence to support them. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed. The named plaintiff’s individual claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. while the class members’ claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. (Musgrave et al v. Quincy Bioscience, LLC et al, Case No. 15-cv-4505, N.D. Cal.)
For more information about TINA.org’s coverage of Prevagen, click here.
TINA.org investigated the marketing of Prevagen, a supplement aimed at people suffering from memory loss, and found that Quincy Bioscience — the marketer and manufacturer of Prevagen — deceptively claimed…
December 2020: The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to pay filing and docketing fees. November 2020: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. Later in…
December 2020: The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to pay filing and docketing fees. November 2020: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. Later in…
December 2020: The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to pay filing and docketing fees. November 2020: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. Later in…
December 2020: The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to pay filing and docketing fees. November 2020: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. Later in…
December 2020: The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to pay filing and docketing fees. November 2020: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. Later in…
December 2020: The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to pay filing and docketing fees. November 2020: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement. Later in…
Pending class-action settlement leaves consumers behind.
Since 1995, the FTC has brought nearly 70 actions over deceptive brain claims.
Researching a company shouldn’t be one-stop shopping.
The largest retailer in the world isn’t just turning a blind eye to the deceptive marketing of these products.
CGI influencers are here.