
Boxes of Junior Mints® and Sugar Babies®
Allegations: Deceptively using slack-filled packaging for candies
March 2021: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.
July 2020: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Maisel et al v. Tootsie Roll Industries, LLC, Case No. 20-cv-5204, N.D. Cal.)
May 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Tootsie Roll Industries for allegedly deceptively using You know when you buy a big bag of chips, and you’re all psyched for a feast, and then it turns out there are like, three chips in the bag? That bag is slack filled.ed boxes for Junior Mints® and Sugar Babies® that are half empty. (Maisel et al v. Tootsie Roll Industries, LLC, Case RG20062689, California State Court – Alameda)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of slack-filled packaging, click here.
Allegations: Deceptively using slack-filled packaging for candies
Allegations: Deceptively using slack-filled packaging
August 2018: A federal judge dismissed this case concluding that the packaging would not mislead reasonable consumers. To read the full court decision, click here. Later in August, the named…
A silly look at the dangers of DIY.
How helpful is this helpline?
TINA.org reader receives suspicious text.
Consumers can’t afford to go it alone when it comes to atypical income claims.
Key phrase: “up to.” The average reward is only five bucks.